PERBANDINGAN DUA SOFTWARE TERHADAP PENGUKURAN QOS (QUALITY OF SERVICE) PADA JARINGAN MYREPUBLIC

Huzaibi, Fahri (2023) PERBANDINGAN DUA SOFTWARE TERHADAP PENGUKURAN QOS (QUALITY OF SERVICE) PADA JARINGAN MYREPUBLIC. Sarjana (S1) thesis, Universitas Islam "45" Bekasi.

	Text PENDAHULUAN.pdf Download (311kB)
	Text BAB I.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (23kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (733kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (105kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (257kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (15kB) | Request a copy
	Text Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (33kB)

Abstract

Quality of Services (QoS) is a network procedure that determines an application or service can function in accordance with the quality of service standards applied. Quality of service (QOS) is performance that has become a requirement in sending packets and data over the network. In providing a good network for users to access the internet network, an analysis of quality of service is needed to improve performance and efficiency. In the preparation stage for QOS measurements, the equipment needed includes hardware devices, namely laptops and wifi routers as well as software devices, namely Wirehark and AxenceNettools. In the QOS data measurement stage which includes: delay, packet loss, throughput, and jitter the researcher will measure using two software, namely Wireshark and AxenceNettools. The measurement to be measured is the network at the home of myrepublic internet service subscribers The results of the wireshark measurement software on the throughput parameter get significant results, the throughput results are very bad because the data retrieval process takes too long, so the throughput value decreases. The results of the axence nettools measurement software in Quality of Service results are superior because the tools in this application are more stable in data collection and the size of the data taken can be adjusted. The wireshark software is superior to the axence nettools software because the wireshark software is able to capture the measurement results of all QOS parameters, namely throughput, packet loss, delay, and jitter compared to the axence nettools software. In the process of finding the value of the quality of service parameter, Wireshark was able to capture a total of 56,000 data packets, while the Axence NetTools software was only 5,600 packets. Keywords : Quality of Service, Delay, Throughput, Packet Loss, Wireshark, Axence nettools

Actions (login required)

View Item