Inovasi Trash for Tax pada Bank Sampah Wijaya Kusuma XVI RW 016 dalam upaya Peningkatan Penerimaan Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan (PBB-P2) di Kelurahan Mustikajaya Kecamatan Mustikajaya Kota Bekasi.

Firmansyah, Krisna (2024) Inovasi Trash for Tax pada Bank Sampah Wijaya Kusuma XVI RW 016 dalam upaya Peningkatan Penerimaan Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan (PBB-P2) di Kelurahan Mustikajaya Kecamatan Mustikajaya Kota Bekasi. Sarjana (S1) thesis, Universitas Islam "45" Bekasi.

	Text PENDAHULUAN.pdf Download (842kB)
	Text BAB I.pdf Download (265kB)
	Text BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (470kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (285kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (715kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB V.pdf Download (164kB)
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (177kB)

Abstract

This research is entitled Waste for Tax Innovation at the Wijaya Kusuma XVI RW 016 Waste Bank in Efforts to Increase Rural and Urban Land and Building Tax Revenue (PBB-P2) in Mustikajaya Village, Mustikajaya District, Bekasi City. The method used in this research is a descriptive research method with a qualitative approach. This research used an instrument in the form of an interview guide with several informants such as (1) Head of Mustikajaya Village, (2) Head of the Community Empowerment and Development Section, (3) Chairman of Wijaya Kusuma XVI Waste Bank RW 016 Mustikajaya Village, (4) Chairman of RW 016 Mustikajaya Village , and (5) RW 016 Mustikajaya Village Supervision and Supervision Task Force. This research uses Innovation Theory by Everret M. Rogers with 5 theoretical indicators, namely (1) Relative Advantages or relative advantage, (2) Compability or suitability, (3) Complexity or complexity, (4) Trialability or ease of trying, and (5) ) Observability or ease of observation. The results of this research are (a) Indicators of Relative Advantages or relative advantages are met with the advantages offered by the Innovation Program, (b) Indicators of Compability or suitability are met with the Taxation Waste Innovation Program which is accompanied by changes to the Waste Innovation Program. method of payment but does not change the main objective, namely paying Rural and Urban Land and Building Tax (PBB-P2), (c) Complexity or completeness indicators are met by the existence of Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) which serve as a reference for innovation users to use the Innovation Program, ( d) Trialability indicators or the possibility of trying to complete the trial process for the Tax Waste Innovation Program for 3 months before the implementation of the Tax Waste Innovation Program, (e) Observability or ease of observation is proven by the impact produced by the Waste Innovation Program for Taxation. In the Waste for Tax Innovation Program there are also supporting factors and obstacles faced. This research produces the outcome that the Waste Innovation Program for Taxation has been implemented well and has had a positive impact in accordance with the objectives of the innovation. Supporting factors such as (1) initiation to create new innovations, (2) support from various parties, (3) benefits offered, and (4) supporting facilities and infrastructure. Then the inhibiting factors are, (1) The target number of customers has not been achieved, (2) Low public awareness of the obligation to pay taxes, and (3) The COVID-19 pandemic. Efforts made to overcome these obstacles include providing advice to residents and customers who have not participated. Keywords: Trash For Tax Innovation, Waste Bank, Urban and Rural Land and Building Tax (PBB-P2).

Actions (login required)

View Item