PERHITUNGAN PERBANDINGAN RAB DAN WAKTU PADA STRUKTUR BAJA UNTUK GUDANG DENGAN METODE KONVENSIONAL DAN PRE ENGINEERING BUILDING (PEB) PADA GUDANG SUN BRIGHT LESTARI, INDRAMAYU, JAWA BARAT

Dhea, Annisa (2023) PERHITUNGAN PERBANDINGAN RAB DAN WAKTU PADA STRUKTUR BAJA UNTUK GUDANG DENGAN METODE KONVENSIONAL DAN PRE ENGINEERING BUILDING (PEB) PADA GUDANG SUN BRIGHT LESTARI, INDRAMAYU, JAWA BARAT. Sarjana (S1) thesis, Universitas Islam “45” Bekasi.

	Text SKRIPSI_AnnisaDhea_PENDAHULUAN.pdf Download (646kB)
	Text SKRIPSI_AnnisaDhea_BAB I.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (85kB) | Request a copy
	Text SKRIPSI_AnnisaDhea_BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (106kB) | Request a copy
	Text SKRIPSI_AnnisaDhea_BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (118kB) | Request a copy
	Text SKRIPSI_AnnisaDhea_BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (382kB) | Request a copy
	Text SKRIPSI_AnnisaDhea_BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (11kB) | Request a copy
	Text SKRIPSI_AnnisaDhea_DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (73kB)

Abstract

The development of steel construction has progressed very rapidly in various innovations, realizing this by utilizing steel material there are several advantages, one of which is saving time and budget costs, but there are still limitations. In the analysis process with conventional methods such as slow processing time and whereas with the Pre-Engineering Building (PEB) method, namely the inability to be modified. This study aims to compare the cost and time of implementation of the conventional method of steel frame construction and the Pre-Engineering Building (PEB) method using the calculation of the budget plan (RAB) and work volume as the basis for the analysis of conventional methods applied to the design of frame warehouses. steel at PT. Sun Bright Lestari in Indramayu found a total cost of IDR 24,641,119,247 with a planning duration of 90 days, while in the Pre-Engineering Building (PEB) method the total cost only reached IDR 16,970,787,797 with a planning duration of implementation for 59 days. The results of the analysis show that there is a difference of 193 or the equivalent of 37.13% between the planning results of the conventional method and the PEB method. These findings indicate that the PEB method is capable of providing significant efficiencies in terms of cost and time for steel frame construction compared to the conventional approach. It is hoped that the results of this study can serve as a guide for construction professionals in choosing a more optimal method for implementing steel frame projects in the future. Keyword : Cost and Time, Steel Structure, PEB and Conventional Method

Actions (login required)

View Item